What do you think about circumcision?
January 7th, 2009 by cfz
What do you think?
I know it is cleaner and I think it even gives them less of a chance of getting some kind of cancer. Google it and/or talk to the doc.
For whatever reason you choose (religion, tradition, medical reasons, or just personal decision) it is your right. For a child, it is up to the parents to make these important decisions concerning their life, the same way you decide about filling in his cavities, raising him healthy, removing his tonsils, piercing her ears, or cutting his hair. It is a very obnoxious idea to â ślet the childâ ť decide. Children are incapable of making completely rational decisions, and will usually make decisions that directly benefit them. This is the reason parents exist. Put a bowl of pasta salad, and a bowl of chocolates and candies in front of them to eat, and Iâ ™m sure they will make the â śrightâ ť choice.
Most of the myths about circumcision are false. Many studies found no correlation in sensitivity between circumcised and uncircumcised penises including the famous Masters and Johnson. Many men who had late circumcisions testify better sensitivity, and the same is vice versa. The internet is full of unreliable sources based solely on opinion, and you cannot take any random blog off any site as solid proof. As far a pain, your child WILL feel pain and he will cry. He will cry the same way he will when he gets his first cut, or when he falls on his behind, or when heâ ™s hungry. He will cry the same way he did when he was born. Babies will cry any time they feel pain or an unwanted change. This is normal and doesnâ ™t always mean you are doing something wrong. When born, a babyâ ™s penis is undeveloped and therefore it will not be so sensitive. If you wait until the child is grown, or when it is developed it will relatively be A LOT more painful, and be tons more traumatizing. It might also bring more complications.
Circumcision isnâ ™t a necessary procedure, but there ARE benefits to it. Ask a qualified doctor and he will give you unbiased explanations. Many will say uncircumcised is the way GOD naturally made it, but many could also argue that GOD is the one who started this tradition. It has been done for thousand of years, and will continue to happen.
Like I said before, as a parent it is your right to make this choice, so donâ ™t listen to anyone else. Think about why you want to do it and if you feel it is necessary, go for it. If not, then donâ ™t. If he hates you for this, and discards the fact that you raised him, fed him, took care of him and put him through school, then so be it.
as a mature woman I slightly prefer a sexual partner to be circumcised, although it doesn't matter that much.
I have heard that circumcision dulls/lessens sexual sensations for the male although i have never heard anyone to really complain (probably because they can't compare)
If you let the child decide when he is older, be aware that it is a painful experience.
The other thing is that, the human body is a remarkable piece of intricate machinery...is there perhaps a reason for the penis being the way it is naturally? Should we interfere with natural biology?
(sorry if i just caused more questions :P)
I believe that it is an unnecessary and irreversible procedure, and personally I wouldnâ ™t do it to my son. It is a myth that uncircumcised penises are unclean and prone to infection. Have these people never heard of a shower?!
The American Academy of Pediatrics say medical research undertaken â śis not sufficient to recommend routine circumcision.â ť They add that â śit is not essential to the childâ ™s wellbeing.â ť Their British, Canadian and Australian counterparts also share the view that it is medically unnecessary.
The USA is the last developed country to still do it routinely though. In Europe, Australia, South America, Canada, and most of Asia, less than 20% of boys are circumcised. Nowadays the rate in the US is at an all-time low:
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article...
A major study published in the Journal of Pediatrics last year found that being circumcised does not markedly reduce the risk of common STDs:
http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(...
Also, the AAP says it does not markedly reduce the risk of penile cancer (which less than 0.1% of uncircumcised men may get) or UTIs (which less than 1% of uncircumcised boys may get).
This website explains some of the protective and sexual benefits of keeping a boy intact:
http://www.noharmm.org/mothering.htm
The overwhelming majority of men who arenâ ™t circumcised are glad they still have their foreskin and most never have any problems with it!
Harriet
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |
Posted in ncgloryholes.com | edit